Legal Opinion
OAO Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 24, 1989No. 235-86CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RADER, Judge.
This nation’s early warning system against missile or air attacks is vital to its defense. In 1981, the United States Air Force (Air Force) concluded that the computer at the center of this system might be vulnerable to a data overload. Therefore, the Air Force Computer Acquisition Center (AFCAC) rushed to procure a computer system to relieve the burden. Plaintiff, OAO Corporation, Inc. (OAO), received a sole source opportunity to bid on the project.
In November 1983, the Air Force and OAO reached an agreement on all procurement terms. The time sensitivity of the project…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- California Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Sierra Military Health Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Heydt v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.