Legal Opinion
California Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided November 14, 1990No. 280-89CPublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MOODY R. TIDWELL, III, Judge:
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss or in the alternative, for summary judgment. Plaintiffs opposed the motion.
FACTS
In 1941, the Army Corps of Engineers designed and constructed Hansen Dam to control Los Angeles Basin flood waters. The Corps initially allocated a portion of the pool storage capacity for sediment deposits that subsequently proved insufficient because of heavy rains, and the residue of fire. Excavating the dam was expensive, and budgetary constraints led to an innovative program under which the Corps granted four…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Maniere v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Cruz-Pagan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Aboo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.