Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Boatner

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 26, 1971No. 23,396PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*377Opinion of the Court

Ferguson, Judge:

The issue in this case is the same as in United States v Rivera, 20 USCMA 6, 42 CMR 198 (1970). In Rivera, a majority of this Court directed that a new post-trial review and action by the convening authority was required because the staff judge advocate, in preparing the review, failed to inform the convening authority that Rivera’s immediate commanding officer had recommended, prior to trial, that Rivera not be eliminated from the service.

Despite his plea of not guilty, the accused in this case was convicted by general court-martial, conducted by a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. MasseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. GriceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. GreenwaltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. United States v. FinsterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. MyhrbergU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  3. United States v. DavisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. YslavaU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API