State v. Miskell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
748 So.2d 409 (1999)
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Lee MISKELL.
No. 98-KK-2146.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
October 19, 1999.
Richard P. Ieyoub, Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, District Atty., Valentin M. Solino, Counsel for Applicant.
Charles Gary Wainwright, New Orleans, Counsel for Respondent.
KNOLL, Justice.[*]
In this criminal writ application, we are called upon to determine whether evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant should be suppressed because the police officers allegedly lacked reasonable suspicion that justified their no-knock entry and forced removal of burglar bars at the front entrance of…
Also in this document: Dissent · Kimball; Dissent · Johnson.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. RobinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- State v. StewartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.