Legal Opinion
State v. Stewart
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 2001No. 2001-K-0530PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
|, MURRAY, Judge.
We grant the State’s writ application to review its contention that the trial court erred in granting a motion to suppress evidence seized while executing a search warrant. We find that under the facts of this case and the applicable jurisprudence, the seizure was illegal and the evidence was properly suppressed. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
New Orleans Police Detective Steven Payne testified at the motion hearing that on November 30, 2000, he obtained a warrant to search a residence located at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Keith HawkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NelsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002