Legal Opinion

Keisel v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1925No. 12896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

The parties hereto will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. .Plaintiff sued defendant alleging H. C. Keisel was the proprietor of the Bristol Hotel in Oklahoma City; that plaintiff was a guest of the hotel, and on “checking out,” asked and received permis'sion to leave her trunk in the baggage room of the hotel', and upon calling fo,r it some days later, the trunk was not to be found, hence, this action for the value of the trunk and contents.

Affidavit for service by publication and attachment was filed on March 26, 1920. Defendant appeared specially and filed…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foreman v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Harris v. ClaflinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Rakowski v. Wagoner, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Spaulding v. PolleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bomford v. Socony Mobil Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  2. Yount v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Oklahoma City Hotel Co. v. LevineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. Lester v. FeuquaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Moore v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API