Legal Opinion

Massey v. Bayless

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1996No. CV 96-0390-APPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOCI, Judge. *

I

The facts of this ease are uneontested. Jacqueline McVay is a candidate for the office of justice of the peace in the Northeast Phoenix Justice Court Precinct in Maricopa County. She does not hold a law degree and is not licensed to practice law in Arizona. Janice Massey, an attorney, is a candidate for the same office. On July 5,1996, Massey filed an action in superior court to enjoin county officials from placing McVay’s name on the ballot, contending that under the Arizona Constitution justices of the peace are required to be attorneys. The trial court granted McVay’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Crouch v. Justice of the Peace Court of the Sixth PrecinctCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Nicol v. Superior Court, Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Justice Court of Tempe Precinct v. KeswickArizona Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Heath v. KigerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. McCannArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Clusiau v. Clusiau Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. University Medical Center Corp. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API