Legal Opinion

State v. McCann

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2001No. CR-99-0227-PRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

McGregor, justice.

¶ 1 In State v. Reagan, 103 Ariz. 287, 440 P.2d 907 (1968), we held that a court can use a prior conviction to enhance a sentence only if “the record of that prior conviction show[s] that [the] defendant was represented by counsel, or advised of his rights to counsel, and waived his right to counsel, before it can be used in [a] subsequent prosecution.” Id. at 289, 440 P.2d at 909. The State asks us to reconsider that holding, asserting that the United States Supreme Court overturned the basis for our Reagan decision in Parke v. Raley, 506 U.S. 20, 113 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Canion v. ColeArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. ConsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State v. MangumCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API