Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*359¶1 — With permission of the condominium board of directors, a unit owner built a second story “bonus room” above his garage. This both converted common area (air space) into apartment area, and created new common area (e.g., walls), thus changing the character of the property and altering all of the owners’ undivided percentage interests in the common areas. Under the condominium declaration, such a change requires unanimous consent of all owners, which was not obtained. The board’s authorization of the bonus room was therefore improper. We reverse the superior court and remand for further…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Buell v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. WilkinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Noble v. MurphyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010