Legal Opinion

Clark County Public Utility District No. 1 v. Wilkinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2000No. 67533-3PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTalmadge, J.

We must decide in this case the appropriate time limit for filing petitions for constitutional writs of certiorari seeking review of public employment arbitration awards. In this case, even though the public utility district (PUD) filed its petition for review in superior court some six months after the arbitrator’s original award and nearly four months after the arbitrator modified a portion of the award, the trial court held the PUD was still entitled to judicial review of the award by constitutional writ of certiorari. By contrast, the Court of Appeals applied by analogy the three-month…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Leschi Improvement Council v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Erection Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Deschenes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Pierce v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Citizens v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. STATE EX REL.(CAT) v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Right-Price Recreation, L.L.C. v. Connells Prairie Community CouncilWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Right-Price Recreation v. Connells PrairieWashington Supreme Court · 2002

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API