Legal Opinion
Woods v. Bailet
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 21, 2003No. 50484-3-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 P.3d 511 (2003)
116 Wash.App. 658
Allie WOODS, Appellant,
v.
Jeffrey BAILET and Jane Doe Bailet; and John Rowland and Jane Doe Rowland, Respondents.
No. 50484-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 21, 2003.
Charles Hamilton, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Mary McIntyre and Michele Forrar, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
COLEMAN, J.
Allie Woods sued her doctors for operating on her without her informed consent. The trial court dismissed the case because Woods failed to first file a claim with the doctors' employer, a public development authority organized as a public corporation and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood BankWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Bosteder v. City of RentonWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Hyde v. University of Washington Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State v. WoffordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.