Legal Opinion
Gould v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 31, 1998No. 97-1777PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion, Judge ERVIN wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge GOODWIN joined. Judge WILLIAMS wrote a dissenting opinion.
OPINION
ERVIN, Circuit Judge:
Andrew Davis, Lee Russo, and Philip Crumbacher (“the officers”) are police officers in Baltimore County, Maryland who appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity. In this § 1983 action, the officers are accused of violating Clarence Gould’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches when they sought and executed a “no-knock” search warrant. We agree…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Brown v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Tammy Cass v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Figg v. SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- David Wadkins v. Robert Arnold, and the First Bank & Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.