Legal Opinion

Veterans' Welfare Board v. Burt

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1935No. Civ. 1522PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLYN, J., pro tem.

The defendant and appellant William Luther Burt in July of 1931 entered into an agreement with plaintiff and respondent to purchase a house and lot under the provisions of the Veterans’ Farm and Home Purchase Act. (Chap. 519, Stats. 1921, as amended by chap. 405, Stats. 1923; chap. 822, Stats. 1927, and chap. 1014, Stats. 1931. ) The total purchase price under the contract was $5,255, payable $262.75 cash and the balance in monthly instalments of $32.96, beginning September 1, 1931. The defendant husband paid the first instalment on October 31, 1931. No further payments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. California Highway Commission v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Los Angeles Auto Tractor Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Maloof v. MaloofCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Oliver v. BoxleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Lacey v. BertoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Union Bond & Trust Company v. Blue Creek Redwood Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1955
  5. Brown v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API