California Highway Commission v. Riley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
This is an application by the Highway Com-
mission for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent, as state controller, to audit and draw his warrant for the payment of a claim presented to him for such audit and warrant. It is alleged in the petition that on or about August 31, 1922, the California Highway Commission as then constituted entered into a written 'contract with one Pollock (hereinafter referred to, for convenience, as the “first contract”) for the construction of a portion of a state highway in Monterey County between Anderson Canyon and Sur River; that in and by said contract…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Jenkins v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lord v. . ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Housing Authority v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Williams v. City of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.