Legal Opinion
Scott Paper Co. v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 2, 1984No. Civ. A. 77-199-JLLPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
Following a twelve-day bench trial and post-trial briefing, this Court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law in the form of a 92-page opinion dated September 5, 1984. 594 F.Supp. 1051. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 197.) The Court held that the patents in suit owned by Scott Paper Company (“Scott”) were valid, enforceable and had been wilfully infringed by Moore Business Forms, Inc. (“Moore”), and that the case was exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285. (Id.) Judgment was entered in favor of Scott against Moore as of September…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company v. Fidelity and Casualty Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Rohm & Haas Company v. Crystal Chemical Company and Joe C. EllerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Celanese Polymer Specialties Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Softsolutions, Inc. v. Brigham Young UniversityUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Tesoro Petroleum Corp. v. Coastal Refining & Marketing, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Howes v. Medical Components, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.