Codex Corp. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
SKINNER, District Judge.
In my Amended Findings, Rulings and Order of March 3, 1982 (“March Order”), I held that plaintiffs were entitled to recover their reasonable attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Plaintiffs have now submitted time records covering the six years of this suit (from 1976 to 1982), defendants have employed a computer program to organize those records into a usable form, and three days of hearings have been held on the reasonableness of plaintiffs’ request for $1,014,662.96 in fees and disbursements. For the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Mitchell G. King, Jr. v. Milton GreenblattCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Campbell v. Spectrum Automation Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Central Soya Company, Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- In re Fine Paper Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lam, Inc. v. Johns-Manville Corporation and Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Marvin Music Co. v. BHC Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Data General Corp. v. Grumman Systems Support Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.