Legal Opinion
Russell v. Microdyne Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1995No. Nos. 93-1895, 93-2078PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge ERVIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MURNAGHAN and Senior Judge HARVEY joined.
OPINION
ERVIN, Chief Judge:
Marie Russell filed suit against Microdyne Corp., her employer, alleging that it had *1232discriminated against her on the basis of her sex in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to -17. Her complaint alleged that she had been denied promotion, had been subjected to sexual harassment in the workplace, and had been subjected to reprisal for her opposition to such treatment. Relying on “after-acquired evidence” of misrepresentations…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Jay Lawrence Halperin v. Abacus Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- Fuller v. PhippsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Grow v. W a Thomas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Ferrell v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2012
- Kulling v. Grinders for Industry, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2000
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.