Adolph E. v. Lori M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]) was properly denied because the complaint states a valid cause of action for negligence. When a person, other than a parent, undertakes to control, care for, or supervise an infant, such person is required to use reasonable care to protect the infant over whom he or she has assumed temporary custody or control, and such person may be liable for any injury sustained by the infant *907which was proximately caused by such person’s negligence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zalak v. CarrollNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- Neumann v. Shlansky, New York County Courts1968
- Neumann v. ShlanskyNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Barrera v. General Electric Co.New York Supreme Court · 1975
- Broome v. HortonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ZZ. v. BlasenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Kolodziejczak v. KolodziejczakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Pitkewicz v. KaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Cruz v. StachowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Sheila C. v. PovichNew York Supreme Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.