Legal Opinion

Zalak v. Carroll

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1965PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: Defendants had undertaken to care for the four-year-old plaintiff during periods in which her mother worked. Although when the arrangement for the daily care of the child began defendants were compensated by the mother, no payments were being made at the time of infant plaintiff’s injury because of a prior reduction in the mother’s earnings. Even without compensation, when defendants undertook to control a young child and provide care for her, they became responsible for her injury through their negligence (Miller v. International Harvester Co., 193 App. Div. 258; Wallace v. Casey…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Wittenberg v. SeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Miller v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kellermann v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2009
  2. Babula v. RobertsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Bartels v. County of WestchesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Home Mutual Insurance v. Broadway Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Standifer v. PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API