Neumann v. Shlansky
New York County Courts
1Opinion of the CourtJohn O. Marbach, J.
Defendant moves to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law of the case since the charge given by me, as Trial Judge, was erroneous as a matter of law.
The question presented here is, as far as can be determined, a case of first impression not only in this State but also in the Nation. The issue is the standard of care which must be exercised by an 11-year-old infant defendant when he is playing golf.
The facts are relatively simple and may be summarized as follows: Defendant, an 11-year-old boy was playing in a foursome at the Harrison…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Benjamin v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Stober v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Gleason v. Hillcrest Golf Course, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Goss v. AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Caballero v. AnselmoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Yoneda v. TomHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Pietrzak v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Neumann v. ShlanskyNew York Supreme Court · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.