Legal Opinion

Neumann v. Shlansky

New York County Courts

Decided October 24, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn O. Marbach, J.

Defendant moves to set aside the verdict and for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law of the case since the charge given by me, as Trial Judge, was erroneous as a matter of law.

The question presented here is, as far as can be determined, a case of first impression not only in this State but also in the Nation. The issue is the standard of care which must be exercised by an 11-year-old infant defendant when he is playing golf.

The facts are relatively simple and may be summarized as follows: Defendant, an 11-year-old boy was playing in a foursome at the Harrison…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dellwo v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  2. Rozell v. RozellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Benjamin v. NernbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Stober v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  5. Gleason v. Hillcrest Golf Course, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Goss v. AllenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  2. Caballero v. AnselmoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  3. Yoneda v. TomHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pietrzak v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Neumann v. ShlanskyNew York Supreme Court · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API