Legal Opinion
State v. . Whitehurst
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 20, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
Can a person be convicted of larceny who is not present when the crime is committed?
The judge charged the jury as follows:
“Now, gentlemen, the court charges you that if you find that Doc Moore and Whitehurst, or either of them, engaged the sale of that cow which was to be stolen and turned to beef, and you find that Manning was a party to it and that be suggested it to tbe others, or either of them, and that in consequence of his suggestion and direction that they or either of them did steal the cow and butcher it and sell the beef and Manning knew it, that he was cooperating with them,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- State v. . SinodisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. . OvercashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- State v. . GeurukusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.