Legal Opinion

State v. . Geurukus

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 16, 1928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted, under a bill of indictment, charging him with criminal abortion, an offense against C. S., 4226. The State’s evidence made out all the material elements of the offense and was sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

The only assignment of error relied on by defendant in this Court is expressed in • defendant’s brief, as follows: “Question involved — court’s erroneous instruction as to testimony of John Henry Robinson, who didn’t testify.” While recapitulating the evidence of the State, the court said: “An old colored man stated that he got some medicine for this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. . LancasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . WhitehurstSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Hardison v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State v. . AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API