State v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
Tbe record contains 116 assignments of error based on 125 exceptions. Obviously they cannot be treated separately in an opinion without extending it to a “burdensome and intolerable length.” S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737. However, none has been overlooked; all have been duly examined and considered. Tbe principal reasons inducing our conclusions on tbe main exceptions follow:
I. Tbe defendants challenge tbe sufficiency of tbe evidence to warrant a conviction on tbe indictment charging a conspiracy to burn tbe property as described, it appearing from tbe confessions,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. . RountreeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. BindykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. AdcockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.