Legal Opinion

Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. Horeb

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2003No. 01-2217PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.

¶ 1. This is a mandamus action to compel a village board to act on an initiative petition pursuant to the direct legislation statute, Wis. Stat. § 9.20 (1999-2000).1

*549¶ 2. The direct legislation statute permits local electors to submit a petition requesting that an attached proposed ordinance either be adopted by the municipality's governing body without alteration or be referred to a vote in the next election. See Wis. Stat. § 9.20(1), (4). The proposed ordinance at issue here, initiated by a group of Mount Horeb citizens, would require the Village of Mount Horeb to hold a binding referendum…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Heider v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Landt v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Flottum v. City of CumberlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kenneth S. v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  3. Bonney v. Indiana Finance AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Oak Creek Citizen's Action Committee v. City of Oak CreekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  5. Wisconsin Elections Commission v. Devin LeMahieuWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API