Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. Horeb
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiane S. Sykes, J.
¶ 1. This is a mandamus action to compel a village board to act on an initiative petition pursuant to the direct legislation statute, Wis. Stat. § 9.20 (1999-2000).1
*549¶ 2. The direct legislation statute permits local electors to submit a petition requesting that an attached proposed ordinance either be adopted by the municipality's governing body without alteration or be referred to a vote in the next election. See Wis. Stat. § 9.20(1), (4). The proposed ordinance at issue here, initiated by a group of Mount Horeb citizens, would require the Village of Mount Horeb to hold a binding referendum…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Heider v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Althouse v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Landt v. City of Wisconsin DellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Flottum v. City of CumberlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kenneth S. v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State ex rel. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
- Bonney v. Indiana Finance AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Oak Creek Citizen's Action Committee v. City of Oak CreekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- Wisconsin Elections Commission v. Devin LeMahieuWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.