Legal Opinion

United States v. Reserve Mining Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 4, 1976No. 5-72-Civil-19PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

1. ASSESSING PENALTIES,

2. IMPOSING SANCTIONS

and

3. REIMBURSING CLEAN WATER EXPENSE

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Minnesota seeks an order imposing penalties on defendants for violation of state pollution control laws and regulations and, with other plaintiffs, moves for an order assessing litigation costs against Reserve Mining Company as a sanction for claimed violations of discovery rules, court orders and other misconduct.

These issues were first presented to the trial court, the Honorable Miles W. Lord presiding, in 1974 but were never adjudicated. Recently these motions were refiled…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Vaughan v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Scott v. Matlack, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  5. Fautek v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API