Blakely v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
1. The court charged: "The testimony of a single witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact. An exception to this rule is made in the case of a felony — and burglary is a felony — where the only witness is an accomplice; in such case corroborating circumstances may dispense with another witness. The corroborating circumstances referred to must be such as to connect the defendant with the perpetration of the crime, and tend to show his participation therein." This rule, so charged, has been well settled since the decision in Childers v. State, 52 Ga. 106. It was applicable to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Childers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
- Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hudson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Hamby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Stebbins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Potter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.