Legal Opinion

Hamby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1950No. 32841PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.

1. In special ground 1 of the motion for a new trial, as amended, the following portion of the charge of the court to the jury is assigned as error: “Now, in this case, the State relies on what is known—it relies in part on what is known as the testimony of an accomplice. And I give you this principle of law to govern you there. The testimony of a single witness is generally sufficient to establish a fact. An exception to this rule is made in the case of a felony. Where the only witness is an accomplice, in such [a felony] case, corroborating, circumstances may dispense with another witness.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Cantrell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Mitchell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  5. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Llewellyn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Brock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Potter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  4. Hamby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  5. Llewellyn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API