Roberts v. State

Jackson, Judge.

The defendant moved for a new trial in this case on two grounds: 1st. That he was convicted on the testimony of an accomplice without corroborating proof; and 2d. That there is no evidence to sustain the finding of-the jury that the stolen goods were wmrth more than $50 00, so as to make the offense a felony.

The court overruled the motion on both grounds, and defendant excepted and assigns error'here thereon.

1, 2. The stolen goods were found at the store of Fain under circumstances of some suspicion against him. He was indicted for receiving stolen goods, knowing them to be…