Legal Opinion
Tinsley v. Goldenstern and Stolpher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 7, 1960No. 38894PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
The parties will be given their designation below.
On July 21, 1958, claimant obtained an award for permanent partial disability of 30 per centum to the body as a whole resulting from an accidental personal injury to the back sustained by him on November 4, 1957.
On March 4, 1959, claimant filed a motion to reopen, seeking additional compensation for increased disability, occasioned by a change for the worse in his physical condition. The trial judge, to whom the case was assigned for hearing, denied the application based upon a finding that “the complaints of increased…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Acme Flour Mills v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Standish Pipe Line Co. v. KirklandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Sanders v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- United States Gypsum Company v. PendletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Sigler v. Tillery and JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Douglas v. Okmar Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Barnard v. Public Service Company of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Hadden v. A & P Tea Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Sooner State Optical, Inc. v. BlackburnCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Sill v. Hydrohoist InternationalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.