Legal Opinion

Sill v. Hydrohoist International

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 8, 2011No. 108,377. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBORAH B. BARNES, Presiding Judge.

{1 Petitioner Robert Sill (Claimant) appeals the trial court's order filed on May 12, 2010, denying his compensation claim for a cumulative trauma injury to his back. The trial court, in a previous order filed on September 5, 2007, awarded Claimant compensation for an on-the-job injury to his "LOW BACK" that occurred on June 27, 2005. One dispositive issue is presented: whether Claimant's subsequent compensation claim following the September 5, 2007, order is barred by the doctrine of claim preclusion. Based upon our review of the facts and law, we find that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  3. Mobbs v. City of LehighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Showpiece Homes Corp. v. Assurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. National Diversified Business Services, Inc. v. Corporate Financial Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee v. Sundance Rehabilitation Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  2. Soule v. Crane LogisticsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. SOULE v. CRANE LOGISTICSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API