Legal Opinion

Hadden v. A & P Tea Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1972No. 10974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

Claimant Hadden herein petitioned the Industrial Accident Board to modify a previously entered compensation agreement on the ground of changed conditions. The Board awarded additional compensation, and the employer and its surety appealed from that order of the Industrial Accident Board.

Claimant Hadden had been employed as a seasonal worker by appellant A & P Tea Company. During the month of January, 1970, in the course of her employment claimant bumped her left elbow, from which she suffered some pain and swelling. During March of the same year she bumped her right elbow and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Johnson v. Boise Cascade CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Fackenthall v. Eggers Pole & Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Craig v. De BergeArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Howard v. Washington Water Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Politte v. Idaho Department of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Neufeld v. Browning Ferris IndustriesIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API