Legal Opinion
Solex Laboratories, Inc. v. Butterfield
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 7, 1961No. Civ. No. 60-107PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs charge that defendant George H. Butterfield, Sr., has infringed on what is commonly known as the Touhy Patent, dealing with contact lenses for the human eye. The cause is before the Court on said defendants’ motion for a temporary injunction restraining plaintiffs from instituting actions in other jurisdictions against licensees of the defendants, in which said licensees are charged with infringement of said patent, and enjoining plaintiffs from notifying members of the trade that corneal contact lenses constructed in acccordance with defendants’ patent…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Crosley Corporation v. Hazeltine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Pacific Contact Laboratories, Inc. v. Solex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Del Mar Avionics, a California Corporation v. Quinton Instruments Company, a Washington CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Plastic Contact Lens Co. v. Frontier of Northeast, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1969
- The Plastic Contact Lens Company, a Corporation v. George H. Butterfield, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Barris/Fraser Enterprises v. Goodson-Todman Enterprises, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Embassy Industries, Inc. v. Federal Boiler Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.