Legal Opinion

The Plastic Contact Lens Company, a Corporation v. George H. Butterfield, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 1966No. 20212PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

Each of the parties owns a patent pertaining to the design and construction of corneal contact lenses. Appellant, the defendant below and hereinafter called Plastic, holds the rights to the so-called Tuohy patent, Number 2,510,438. It is senior to that called the Butterfield patent, Number 2,544,246, owned by George H. Butterfield, Sr. As plaintiff, Butter-field was successful in the court below, and Plastic appeals.

The present dispute follows a long history of controversy arising from conflicting claims pertaining to the two patents and their scope. A part of the history…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Esco Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. Pacific Contact Laboratories, Inc. v. Solex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Plastic Contact Lens Co. v. Frontier of Northeast, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1969
  2. Glen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  3. Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Yuma Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
  4. Heerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1984
  5. Crown Machine & Tool Co. v. D & S Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API