The Plastic Contact Lens Company, a Corporation v. George H. Butterfield, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
Each of the parties owns a patent pertaining to the design and construction of corneal contact lenses. Appellant, the defendant below and hereinafter called Plastic, holds the rights to the so-called Tuohy patent, Number 2,510,438. It is senior to that called the Butterfield patent, Number 2,544,246, owned by George H. Butterfield, Sr. As plaintiff, Butter-field was successful in the court below, and Plastic appeals.
The present dispute follows a long history of controversy arising from conflicting claims pertaining to the two patents and their scope. A part of the history…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Esco Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Pacific Contact Laboratories, Inc. v. Solex Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Plastic Contact Lens Co. v. Frontier of Northeast, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1969
- Glen Manufacturing, Inc. v. Perfect Fit Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Yuma Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1969
- Heerema Marine Contractors v. Santa Fe International Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1984
- Crown Machine & Tool Co. v. D & S Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.