Legal Opinion
Boer v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1989No. 88-798PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge:
Petitioners Frank and Ellen Boer, former tenants of intervenors Arthur and Sherrill Houghton, seek review of a decision of the Rental Housing Commission (RHC) giving them only limited relief for violation of the rent control laws by intervenors. Finding no error, we affirm the RHC’s decision.
I
In anticipation of out-of-town employment which would require them to rent what had been the family home, Mr. and Mrs. Houghton registered their home on November 20, 1974, with the Rent Administrator. 1 The registration statement was filed by the Houghtons’ agent, Begg Realtors,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Remin v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Charles E. Smith Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Quality Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by8 opinions
- Goodman v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jerome Management, Inc. v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Bank-Fund Staff Federal Credit Union v. CuellarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- McCulloch v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Hanson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.