Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture Industries

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1998No. COA97-1445PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

First we consider whether the full Commission failed to give proper deference to the deputy commissioner’s credibility determination. Defendant argues that the full Commission did not acknowledge the general rule that deputy commissioners are in a better position to judge credibility as mandated by Sanders v. Broyhill. Defendant further argues that plaintiff’s ignorance of workers’ compensation law is not a valid justification for finding plaintiff credible.

We reaffirm our holding in Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture Industries, 124 N.C. App. 637, 640-41, 478 S.E.2d 223,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Guy v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Gilliam v. Perdue FarmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Holcomb v. Pepsi Cola Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Cotton-Lyons v. Bridgestone-FirestoneNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
  3. Gonzalez v. Bennett's Creek Wholesale NurseryNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2011
  4. Guevara v. Tb Construction, Inc.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2010
  5. Haney v. Sunbridge Nursing CenterNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API