Legal Opinion

Matter of DiPippo

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 10, 1996No. 96-235-M.PPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter comes before us pursuant to Article III, Rule 6(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island (board) voted to recommend sanctions against the respondent-attorney (respondent) following a full disciplinary hearing. The respondent, Robert F. DiPippo, came before the court pursuant to an order directing him to appear and show cause why he should not be disciplined. After considering the findings and reeom- mendations of the board and the arguments presented by the respondent, we shall impose…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Carter v. KritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. In re Robert Lee Vogel, BPR 023374Tennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Matter of DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. ChinquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API