Legal Opinion

Carter v. Kritz

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 27, 1989No. 89-262-M.PPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This disciplinary matter is before the Supreme Court pursuant to Rule 42-6(b) of the Supreme Court Rules. The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island voted to recommend sanctions against the respondent attorney following a full disciplinary hearing. The respondent came before the court pursuant to an order directing him to appear and show cause why he should not be disciplined.

Three petitions, alleging violations of Disciplinary Rules DR1-102(A)(6), DR5-101(A) and DR5-104(A) were filed against respondent. 1 Prior to presenting evidence before the panel, respondent,…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. DurhamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  2. In the Matter of WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. HeilprinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In re GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of BergrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of DiPippoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  3. In Re PellizzariSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Matter of Discipline of BergrenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API