Legal Opinion

Matter of DiSandro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 29, 1996No. 96-356-M.PPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter is before the court pursuant to a decision and recommendation of the Supreme Court Disciplinary Board (board) that the respondent, Edmond A. DiSandro, be publicly censured. Article III, Rule 6(d), of the Supreme Court Rules of Disciplinary Procedure provides in part:

“If the [Disciplinary] Board determines that a proceeding ⅞ * * should be concluded by public censure * ⅜ * it shall submit its findings and recommendations, together with the entire record, to this Court. This Court shall review the record and enter an appropriate order.”

The facts giving rise to these…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. E.W. Audet & Sons, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurace Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  2. Matter of DiPippoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vallinoto v. DiSandroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. In Re BergSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. In Re HeardWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against HeardWashington Supreme Court · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API