Legal Opinion

Blair v. Carpenter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Ottawa. (Dickerman, «L, presiding.) Bills to foreclose two mortgages. Defendant Carpenter appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The bills in these cases are filed to foreclose two certain indentures of mortgage. The two cases were heard as one in this Court, and the rights of all the parties are so connected that they may be disposed of together. The first bill alleged substantially that Myron Harris, now *168deceased, in his life-time, and on the twenty-seventh day of September, 1858, made and delivered his promissory note to Francis Alvord, dated October 1, 1858, for $1,000, payable one year after date, with interest at 10 per cent., and to secure the payment thereof made and delivered to him an indenture of mortgage of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goenen v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Shelden v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Weir v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Simons v. Douglas' Extr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Grace Harbor Lumber Co. v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Beiseker v. SvendsgaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Beaupre v. HolzbaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API