Legal Opinion

Goenen v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1871PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This action was brought in the district court for Hennepin county and was tried by the court without a jury. Judgment was ordered and entered in favor of defendants, from which the plaintiff appeals. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Ripley, Ch. J.

The mortgage, which is the subject of this action, is that upon the foreclosure whereof by advertisement and expiration of the year of redemption, the respondent, Schroeder, the mortgagee,, commenced the proceedings before a justice of the peace to obtain possession of the mortgaged premises, wherein the justice’s judgment for the plaintiff being removed by certiorari to the district court, and there affirmed, that judgment was on error, affirmed in this court. Goenen vs. Schroeder, 8 Minn. 387.

The present action, ignoring the foreclosure proceeding, alleges a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Demarest v. . DargNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Bidwell v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
  3. Goenen v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1863
  4. Conklin v. HindsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  5. Matthews v. DuryeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stundahl v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Golcher v. BrisbinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Lomax v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  4. State ex rel. Grande v. BatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  5. Blair v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API