Legal Opinion
Weir v. Hudnut
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1888No. 13,256PublishedCited by 7 opinions
From the Posey Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant’s amended complaint, omitting the formal parts, is this :
“That the plaintiff sold five thousand bushels of corn to the defendant under a certain contract, that is to say, the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff for said corn fifty cents per bushel, and in part payment therefor, in addition to said fifty cents per bushel, the defendant further agreed to hire to plaintiff, and to give him the use of, a sufficient number of sacks in which to sack said corn and deliver the same to the defendant, which said use of said sacks gíbame and was a part of the consideration and payment…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kuhns v. GatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Howe v. HaywardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Bissell v. . BalcomNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Phillips v. Ocmulgee MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blair v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- French v. Boston National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Driggs v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Wenger v. GrummelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
- Phillips v. GoochNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.