Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13854PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The above-entitled proceeding has for its object the discipline of A. H. Carpenter, an attorney at law of Stockton, California, and a member of the incorporated State Bar.

The charges are made in proper form and in essence are that said attorney is guilty of an infraction of number 12 of the Rules of Professional Conduct approved by this court, in that he communicated with a party represented by counsel on the subject of controversy in the absence of and without the consent of such counsel. The basis for this charge will be found in the following statement:

In 1912 Henry R. Howe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howe v. HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilhelm v. Pray, Price, Williams & RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Mitton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Turner v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. In Re CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API