Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Takeda
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 14, 2003No. Civil 01-00729 SOM/KSCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MOLLWAY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Plaintiff Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”) brings this declaratory action to determine whether, pursuant to a homeowner’s insurance policy, it must defend and indemnify Paul S. Takeda (“Takeda”) in a tort action. To the extent that Allstate claims that Takeda’s acts were not an occurrence or that coverage is precluded by the intentional and/or criminal acts exclusions to the policy, the court finds that there is a genuine issue of material fact as…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. First Insurance Co. of Hawai'i, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Great Divide Insurance v. AOAO Maluna Kai EstatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2007
- Bearden v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. WimberlyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Bamert v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005