Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. State
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHood, P.J.
Defendant, state of Michigan, appeals as of right from the trial court’s determination that legislative approval, by resolution, of compacts allowing operation of casinos by Indian tribes violated provisions of the Michigan Constitution. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
In 1997 and 1998, Governor John Engler negotiated compacts with four Indian tribes 2 to permit class in gaming by the tribes on eligible Indian lands in Michigan. The terms of the compacts contained various regulatory provisions. The tribes agreed to hiring criteria for their employees and management and agreed to provide…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- In Re MCI Telecommunications ComplaintMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Virginia v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Van Buren Charter Township v. Garter Belt, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- Schoenherr v. Stuart Frankel Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Schoenherr v. Stuart Frankel Development Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.