Legal Opinion
Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 1946No. 9066PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
Scrutiny of the briefs and appendices and careful consideration of the oral arguments convince us that the court below committed no error in respect to count 3 of the complaint, the only count before us for consideration. Accordingly the judgment of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Leahy, 61 F.Supp. 767, 771, 772.
Judge O’CONNELL participated in the consideration and decision of this case but was unable to collaborate in the preparation of the opinion.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1945
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Aralac, Inc. v. Hat Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co. v. Hughes Tool Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
- Nolan v. Judicial Council of Third CircuitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1972
- Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. Lummus CompanyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.