Legal Opinion

Spebar v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided September 3, 2003No. 04-03-00026-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice.

Defendant was charged with driving while intoxicated. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress the results of his blood test, defendant pled guilty pursuant to a plea bargain. On appeal, defendant asserts that the taking of his blood by hospital personnel was an assault; therefore, the results of the blood test were obtained illegally and should have been suppressed. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to suppress; therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order.

BACKGROUND

At approximately…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. State v. HardyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Hailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. St. Clair v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. KellyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Ramos v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  3. Shane Owens v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Kristina Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  5. Kristina Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API