Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1963No. 251PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOND, Justice.

A jury found Watson guilty of second degree murder. His principal contention on this appeal is that reversible error was committed by the admission of certain incompetent and prejudicial testimony.

The decedent, Marion Grissom, an acquaintance of Watson and his wife, was a visitor in their home during the late afternoon of December 18, 1961. There was evidence that the parties were drinking alcoholic beverages. Watson testified that at about 6:00 p. m. he left his wife and Grissom at his home while he went to have his truck fixed. When he returned at about 8:00 p. m., he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. The People v. PolandIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Commonwealth v. FugmannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Keefe v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. CavinessNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Hubert Junior Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API