Legal Opinion

Frink v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1979No. 3106PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice.

Glenn Frink appeals his conviction of first degree murder, urging four grounds of error: first, inadmissible hearsay and character evidence was presented to the grand jury and the remaining evidence was insufficient for indictment; second, the prosecutor’s failure to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury requires dismissal of the indictment; third, the trial court incorrectly admitted the results of a search of defendant’s car; and fourth, impermissible character evidence was introduced at trial. We reject each of these grounds and affirm the…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. State v. CoutureSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Mallott v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Buzbee v. DonnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Waring v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Lerchenstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API