Legal Opinion

In Re Larsen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 12, 1991No. 89-1424PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter comes to us from the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) as a reciprocal discipline case that arose because the Court of Appeals of Maryland disciplined respondent for misappropriation of client funds. 1 We accept the Board’s recommendation and impose the discipline recommended by the Board.

In reciprocal discipline cases, this court imposes an “identical discipline” unless we determine “[t]he misconduct established warrants substantially different discipline in the District of Columbia.” D.C.Bar R. XI, § 11(f). The Court of Appeals of Maryland suspended respondent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
In Re GarnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
In Re ReidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
In Re JacobyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
In Re BelzSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
In Re ApplerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
In Re DruryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.