Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Higgins

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1968No. 40937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

At the outset, it must be noted that the defendant, appellant herein, argues that the court below, by its decision, circumvented the constitutional provision that “no judgment of any court of record entered on the verdict of the jury shall be set aside or reversed on the weight of the evidence except by the concurrence of all three judges of a Court of Appeals,” as embodied in Section 6, Article IV of the Constitution of Ohio.

*242The decision below, as previously mentioned, was by a vote of two judges to one. The Court of Appeals found assignments of error Nos. 1 through 6 to be well taken, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Uncapher v. Baltimore & Ohio Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wever v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Porter v. Toledo Terminal Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Clevenger v. HulingOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jones v. Wittenberg UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. WoodsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. DeAmiches v. PopczunOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Kafel v. Republic Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Mulloy v. Longaberger, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API